Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order rejecting the request to waive the assessment procedure and the consequent assessment process could be sustained when the records were lost in a fire accident and the assessee had filed returns and paid tax.
Analysis: The impugned order rested on alleged suppression, non-production of records, and the view that the earlier relief granted in another case was inapplicable. The record did not support a finding of suppression, since the notices only alleged non-production of documents. The fire accident was not disputed, and in the absence of any material to show deliberate or motivated loss, the event had to be treated as a force majeure situation. The proceedings had remained pending for years, and the assessee could not be treated as solely responsible where the statutory process required the Assessing Officer to call for records and complete the assessment. The rejection was therefore based on irrelevant considerations and ignored relevant ones.
Conclusion: The rejection of waiver was unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remanded with a direction to waive the assessment procedure and complete the assessments after granting personal hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An administrative order declining waiver of assessment procedure is liable to be interfered with where it is founded on unsupported allegations and ignores undisputed force majeure circumstances and the statutory assessment framework.