Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sugar syrup arising during manufacture of biscuits and captively consumed in the factory was liable to Central Excise duty in the absence of evidence of marketability.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the coordinate Bench view that duty cannot be levied on the intermediate product unless the Department establishes that the product, in the form in which it emerges, is marketable and otherwise excisable. The record did not show any evidence that the sugar syrup generated during biscuit manufacture was marketable, and the same issue had already been decided in favour of the assessee in earlier Tribunal orders relied upon by both sides.
Conclusion: Sugar syrup captively consumed during the manufacture of biscuits was not liable to Central Excise duty, as marketability was not proved.
Final Conclusion: All the appeals succeeded and the assessees were granted consequential relief in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An intermediate product captively consumed in manufacture is not exigible to Central Excise duty unless marketability is established by evidence.