Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cement used for stabilisation and disposal of hazardous industrial waste in a secured landfill qualified as an input for Cenvat credit under Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The cement was used for treatment and disposal of hazardous waste generated during the manufacturing operations, in compliance with environmental requirements. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and applied the principle that goods used for pollution control or effluent treatment form an essential and integral part of the manufacturing process when such treatment is necessary to carry on the manufacture. On that basis, the use of cement for stabilisation of toxic waste was treated as directly connected with the manufacturing activity.
Conclusion: The cement qualified for Cenvat credit and no reversal was warranted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used for mandatory effluent treatment or pollution-control measures that are an essential and integral part of the manufacturing process qualify as inputs for Cenvat credit.