Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (11) TMI 72 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeals by Revenue partly allowed, grounds dismissed/allowed based on consistent rulings, Supreme Court decision. Assessee's cross objections dismissed. The appeals filed by the Revenue were partly allowed, with specific grounds being dismissed or allowed based on consistent rulings and the Supreme Court's ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeals by Revenue partly allowed, grounds dismissed/allowed based on consistent rulings, Supreme Court decision. Assessee's cross objections dismissed.

                            The appeals filed by the Revenue were partly allowed, with specific grounds being dismissed or allowed based on consistent rulings and the Supreme Court's decision. The cross objections by the assessee were dismissed as not pressed. The order was pronounced in the open court on 04/10/2017.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Status of the assessee as an individual or HUF.
                            2. Exemption under Section 10(19A) on rental income from Ummed Bhawan Palace.
                            3. Classification of receipts from ITC Ltd. as business income or income from other sources.
                            4. Classification of interest on FDRs as business income or income from other sources.
                            5. Classification of income from Sarovar Complex as business income or income from house property.
                            6. Disallowance of business expenses.
                            7. Deduction for Senior Citizen quantum of exemption.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Status of the Assessee:
                            The CIT(A) held that the assessee should be deemed an individual owner of all properties comprised in the estate, following the decision of the ITAT Jaipur and earlier orders. This ground was consistently decided in favor of the assessee in previous years, and thus, the appeal on this ground was dismissed.

                            2. Exemption under Section 10(19A):
                            The CIT(A) allowed the exemption under Section 10(19A) for the rental income received from Ummed Bhawan Palace, including the rental income from land and structures requisitioned by the defense department. This decision was based on the Supreme Court's ruling, which confirmed that the entire rental income from the palace is exempt from income tax. Consequently, the addition of accrued income was not sustained, and this ground of appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.

                            3. Classification of Receipts from ITC Ltd.:
                            The CIT(A) held that receipts from ITC Ltd. should be classified as business income under Section 28 of the I.T. Act, 1961, rather than as income from other sources. This decision followed the consistent rulings of the ITAT in earlier years, which treated such receipts as business income. The appeal on this ground was dismissed.

                            4. Classification of Interest on FDRs:
                            The CIT(A) determined that the net interest income from bank deposits should be assessed as business income, not income from other sources. This decision was consistent with the ITAT's rulings in previous years. However, the Coordinate Bench had earlier decided that such interest income should be treated as income from other sources, leading to the appeal on this ground being allowed.

                            5. Classification of Income from Sarovar Complex:
                            The CIT(A) ruled that income from the commercial property (Sarovar Complex) should be assessed as business income, not as income from house property. This decision followed the consistent rulings of the ITAT in earlier years. The appeal on this ground was dismissed.

                            6. Disallowance of Business Expenses:
                            The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance of business expenses to 20% of the total claimed expenses, which amounted to Rs. 7,12,020/-. The balance disallowance was directed to be deleted, following the ITAT's rulings in earlier years. This ground of appeal was partly allowed.

                            7. Deduction for Senior Citizen Quantum of Exemption:
                            The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision not to allow the deduction for Senior Citizen quantum of exemption under Section 88B of the I.T. Act, 1961. The appeal on this ground was dismissed.

                            Cross Objections by the Assessee:
                            The assessee's cross objections regarding the exemption under Section 10(19A) and the Senior Citizen quantum of exemption were not pressed, following the Supreme Court's decision. Consequently, the cross objections were dismissed as not pressed.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeals filed by the Revenue were partly allowed, with specific grounds being dismissed or allowed based on consistent rulings and the Supreme Court's decision. The cross objections by the assessee were dismissed as not pressed. The order was pronounced in the open court on 04/10/2017.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found