Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activity of supplying materials, carrying out installation, testing and commissioning in connection with cathodic protection systems constituted a composite works contract not exigible to service tax under Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services for the period prior to 01.07.2006.
Analysis: The dispute concerned a composite arrangement involving supply of materials and execution of installation and commissioning work. The original authority itself treated the activity as a works contract. The governing principle from the Supreme Court decision in Larsen & Toubro was applied, namely that the charging provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, as they then stood, covered service contracts simpliciter and not composite works contracts. The later statutory recognition of works contracts and the scheme under the 2007 composition rules reinforced that such composite contracts were brought to tax only prospectively.
Conclusion: The activity was a works contract not taxable under Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services for the period in dispute, and the demand was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed, and the order granting relief to the assessee was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Composite works contracts were not taxable as service contracts under the pre-01.07.2006 service tax regime merely because installation or commissioning elements were involved.