Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 requires payment of 6% of the sale value on clearance of bagasse, press-mud, boiler ash and compost treated as waste or by-products arising during manufacture.
Analysis: The goods cleared without duty were found to be waste or by-products arising inevitably in the course of manufacture of dutiable sugar and molasses. The jurisdictional precedent had already held that provisions analogous to Rule 6 do not apply to waste arising during manufacture, and that liability under the rule is confined to final products and not waste. The later amendment expanding the definition of exempted goods was distinguished because the present dispute concerned waste/by-products, and the circular relied upon also recognized that CENVAT credit is admissible where inputs are contained in waste, refuse or by-products. On that basis, the Court held that reversal under Rule 6(3) was not warranted.
Conclusion: Rule 6(3) was held to be inapplicable to the clearance of the waste/by-products, and the demand for 6% was rejected in favour of the assessee.