Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies to clearance of waste, refuse or by-products such as pressmud, bagasse and compost.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the disputed goods were waste or by-products arising during manufacture and that the identical issue had already been decided in earlier Tribunal and High Court decisions. It was held that the provision requiring reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) is meant for final products and does not extend to waste or by-products generated in the course of manufacture. The insertion of the explanation in Rule 6(1) regarding non-excisable goods did not alter the position for waste or by-products, and the CBEC circular also supported admissibility of credit where inputs are contained in such waste or by-products.
Conclusion: Rule 6(3) does not apply to clearance of waste or by-products, and cenvat credit reversal was not required.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed, resulting in relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Reversal of credit under Rule 6(3) is not attracted for waste, refuse or by-products generated in the manufacturing process, even where such goods are cleared without payment of duty.