Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applies to bagasse (a by-product/waste) arising during the manufacture of sugar and molasses, thereby attracting recovery of CENVAT credit and penalty.
Analysis: Rule 6 and its Explanation I extend to exempted or non-excisable goods only where such goods amount to a manufacture of excisable goods; the amended definitions and Explanation I do not convert agricultural waste or residue into a manufactured final product. A binding Supreme Court ruling holds that bagasse is agricultural waste/residue and not the result of a manufacturing process, and therefore outside the scope of excisable goods and of Rule 6. Coordinate Tribunal decisions applying that ratio conclude that by-products such as bagasse, press mud and boiler ash, which merely emerge as waste/residue during manufacture, do not fall within manufacturing activity and thus Rule 6 is not attracted. A departmental circular relied upon to sustain demands has been rescinded in view of this legal position.
Conclusion: Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply to bagasse as it is a by-product/agricultural waste and not a manufactured final product; the demands, interest and penalty confirmed under the impugned order are set aside and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.