Unit container classification requires judicially tested packaging criteria; branding alone cannot sustain excise duty on food preparations.

For tariff entries applying only to goods put up in unit containers, the authority must examine whether the packaging meets the judicial meaning of a unit container, namely a container designed to hold a pre-determined quantity. Branding, wrappers, cartons or pouches used for serving food do not by themselves establish that requirement. Because the adjudicating authority did not consider the relevant interpretive authorities, the classification and excisability findings could not stand on the existing record. The question of unit-container classification was remitted for fresh reconsideration, and the impugned order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the edible preparations served and sold by the restaurant were put up in unit containers so as to attract classification under the relevant tariff sub-headings and central excise duty.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the meaning of "unit container" in Note 1 to Section IV of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The adjudicating authority had treated the wrappers, cartons and pouches used for serving the food as unit containers merely because they bore the brand name and could hold a saleable quantity. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had relied on authorities explaining that a unit container must be designed to hold a pre-determined quantity, and that the cited decisions were not considered by the adjudicating authority while reaching its conclusion. Since the definition and its judicial interpretation were central to deciding whether the food preparations were chargeable to duty, the classification and dutiability findings could not be sustained without a fresh examination.

Conclusion: The question whether the food preparations were put up in unit containers was remitted for reconsideration, and the impugned order was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff entries that apply only to goods put up in unit containers, the authority must determine whether the packaging satisfies the legal meaning of a unit container as judicially interpreted, and a duty demand cannot rest merely on the presence of branding or the form of serving packaging.

---