Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether aluminium foil packing around processed cheese cubes constituted a "container" within entry 6 of Schedule E to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, so as to attract tax as goods sold in sealed containers, or whether the sale fell under the residuary entry 22.
Analysis: The decisive question was the meaning of "container" in entry 6. The expression was held to denote an article meant or intended for holding goods, having a recognisable and independent existence as a receptacle. A thin sheet of aluminium foil, which had no definite form until wrapped around the cheese cubes, was treated as a wrapper and not as a container. The fact that the goods were packed in heat-sealed foil and sold in cardboard cartons did not change the character of the foil. Since the foil was not a container, the goods could not be treated as sold in sealed containers for purposes of entry 6.
Conclusion: The processed cheese cubes were not covered by entry 6 and were taxable under the residuary entry 22.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of a taxing entry, a "container" must be a distinct receptacle intended to hold goods and not merely a wrapping material that assumes shape only after being applied to the goods.