Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 could be sustained where service tax and interest on renting of immovable property services had been paid before the statutory cutoff.
Analysis: The liability related to service tax on consideration received for renting of immovable property. The Tribunal noted that Section 80(2) and Section 80A of the Finance Act, 1994 provided that where the service tax liability together with interest is discharged within the prescribed period after presidential assent to the Finance Act, 2012, penalty would not arise. Since the appellant had discharged the tax and interest before such assent, the conditions for invoking penalty were not satisfied.
Conclusion: The penalties were not sustainable and were set aside in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Where service tax liability with interest on renting of immovable property services is paid within the period prescribed by Section 80A of the Finance Act, 1994, penalty cannot be imposed.