Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ducts fabricated at site during supply, installation, erection and commissioning of HVAC systems were marketable excisable goods liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The dispute was covered by the assessee's own earlier decision and by settled precedent. The ducts were fabricated as part of an integrated air-conditioning plant contract, and the relevant circular treated an air-conditioning plant as a system rather than as separate goods. On that basis, the fabricated ducts were not treated as articles known to the market capable of being bought and sold as such.
Conclusion: The ducts were not excisable goods and the duty demand and penalty were not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the order setting aside the duty demand was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods fabricated at site as part of an integrated plant/system are not dutiable unless they are shown to be marketable excisable goods.