<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 692 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346634</link>
    <description>Ducts fabricated at site as part of an integrated HVAC plant were not treated as marketable excisable goods, because the contract involved supply, installation, erection and commissioning of a system rather than sale of separate articles. Applying settled precedent and the relevant circular, the tribunal held that such site-fabricated ducts were not shown to be goods known to the market as capable of being bought and sold. The duty demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 692 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346634</link>
      <description>Ducts fabricated at site as part of an integrated HVAC plant were not treated as marketable excisable goods, because the contract involved supply, installation, erection and commissioning of a system rather than sale of separate articles. Applying settled precedent and the relevant circular, the tribunal held that such site-fabricated ducts were not shown to be goods known to the market as capable of being bought and sold. The duty demand and penalty were therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>