Bona fide duty-evasion cases may not justify redemption fine, while a nominal penalty can still be sustained.

Where bona fides were accepted in a duty-evasion matter, redemption fine in lieu of confiscation was held unwarranted and was set aside. The Tribunal noted that the goods had been cleared without payment of duty, but earlier remand directions had recognised the assessee's bona fides, so mandatory redemption fine was not justified. By contrast, the nominal penalty imposed under Section 11AC was found consistent with the remand directions and the recorded facts, and there was no basis to enhance it. The assessee obtained relief only on redemption fine, while the nominal penalty was maintained.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the redemption fine imposed in lieu of confiscation was sustainable, and (ii) whether the nominal penalty was liable to be interfered with or enhanced.

Issue (i): whether the redemption fine imposed in lieu of confiscation was sustainable

Analysis: The adjudicating authority had ordered confiscation of the seized goods and plant and machinery with option to redeem on payment of fine. The Tribunal noted that the case was one where the goods were cleared without payment of duty, but the assessee's bona fides had been recognised in the earlier remand directions. In that background, and in view of the earlier observation that mandatory redemption fine need not be imposed where bona fides are established, the fine could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The redemption fine was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether the nominal penalty was liable to be interfered with or enhanced

Analysis: The Commissioner had imposed only a nominal penalty of Rs. 10,000 under Section 11AC after the remand directions. The Tribunal found that the nominal penalty accorded with the earlier directions and that the Department had no basis to seek enhancement on the facts recorded. The penalty therefore did not warrant interference.

Conclusion: The nominal penalty was upheld and the Department's request for enhancement was rejected.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained partial relief only to the extent of deletion of redemption fine, while the duty-related findings and nominal penalty were maintained and the Department's appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where bona fides are established in cases of duty evasion, redemption fine in lieu of confiscation is not warranted, though a nominal penalty may still be sustained if consistent with the remand directions and the facts found.

---