<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 886 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345774</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against extending modvat benefit. In the final order, the Commissioner allowed modvat credit of Rs. 18,34,353, demanded Rs. 6,18,103 in duty, imposed penalties, and ordered confiscation with redemption fine options. The redemption fine was dropped, and the penalty of Rs. 10,000 was upheld, partially allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:12:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=483092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 886 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345774</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against extending modvat benefit. In the final order, the Commissioner allowed modvat credit of Rs. 18,34,353, demanded Rs. 6,18,103 in duty, imposed penalties, and ordered confiscation with redemption fine options. The redemption fine was dropped, and the penalty of Rs. 10,000 was upheld, partially allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>