Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption available under the customs notification could be denied on the basis of the Exim Policy, and whether the customs exemption notification alone governed entitlement to duty exemption for the imported steel pots.
Analysis: The charging and exemption scheme under the Customs Act governed levy and exemption of customs duty. The power to restrict imports under the Import and Export Control Act did not confer any power to levy or exempt customs duty. Where two statutes operate in different fields, the law specifically dealing with customs duty is the special law for that purpose. Once an exemption notification was issued under the customs exemption power, its scope could not be curtailed by the Exim Policy. The description in the notification covered steel pots used for manufacture of gems and jewellery for export, and the departmental refusal based on the import policy was inconsistent with that notification.
Conclusion: The denial of customs exemption was jurisdiction and the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the notification.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded because entitlement to customs exemption had to be determined solely under the customs exemption notification, and the import policy could not restrict that benefit.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a customs exemption is granted under the statutory exemption power, its scope cannot be reduced or controlled by an import-control policy operating in a different field.