Court admits insolvency petition under Section 10 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Interim resolution professional appointed, moratorium declared.

The court admitted the insolvency petition filed under Section 10 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, by a company against State Bank of India. An Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional was appointed after objections were resolved, and a moratorium was declared under Section 13 of the Code. The moratorium prohibited actions against the corporate debtor, ensuring essential services continued. The order aimed to facilitate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, with parties instructed to comply.

---

---

Issues:
1. Filing of insolvency petition under Section 10 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Appointment of Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional.
3. Declaration of moratorium under Section 13 of the Code.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 10 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing State Bank of India as a financial creditor. The petitioner provided details of debts due to secured creditors, operational creditors, and statutory liabilities. The petitioner also mentioned actions taken by the bank under the SARFAESI Act and pending proceedings before the DRT and BIFR.

2. The petitioner named an Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional and submitted necessary documents. After objections from the State Bank of India regarding the proposed professional, an alternate name was suggested and accepted. The Adjudicating Authority appointed the new professional and directed the petitioner to make a public announcement as required by Section 13 of the Code.

3. The Adjudicating Authority declared a moratorium under Section 13(l)(a) of the Code, prohibiting various actions against the corporate debtor, including suits, asset transfers, and enforcement of security interests. Essential services to the corporate debtor were to continue during the moratorium period. The moratorium order was to remain in force until the completion of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, subject to statutory provisions.

In conclusion, the petition was admitted under Section 10(4)(a) of the Code, an Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional was appointed, and a moratorium was declared to facilitate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The order was communicated to the concerned parties for compliance.

---