Company Merger Approved: Heritage Foods, Future Retail Get Green Light for Business Restructuring. The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 52, 66, and 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Company Merger Approved: Heritage Foods, Future Retail Get Green Light for Business Restructuring.
The National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 52, 66, and 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, involving Heritage Foods Limited, Heritage Foods Retail Limited, and Future Retail Limited. The Tribunal found that all statutory requirements were satisfied, stakeholders were duly notified, and the majority approved the scheme. Favorable responses from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, along with approval from the Competition Commission of India, supported the decision. Consequently, the scheme was declared binding on all stakeholders, and the company was instructed to file the order with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days and notify all relevant parties.
Issues Involved: 1. Sanctioning of Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 52 and 66, 230 to 232 of Companies Act, 2013 by National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad.
Detailed Analysis: 1. The Company Petition CP.No.19/230/HDB/2017 was filed by Heritage Foods Limited seeking sanction of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement under relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme aimed to be binding on all stakeholders, including Shareholders, Secured Creditors, Unsecured Creditors/Trade Creditors, and Employees, as well as on the company itself. The scheme involved Heritage Foods Limited, Heritage Foods Retail Limited, and Future Retail Limited.
2. The relevant facts included the incorporation details of the involved companies, the business verticals they operated in, and the benefits expected from the proposed arrangement. The Board of Directors of the companies had approved the scheme, and necessary meetings were conducted as per the Tribunal's directions.
3. The Tribunal ensured that all stakeholders were duly notified of the proposed scheme, and necessary meetings were conducted in compliance with the law. The majority of stakeholders approved the scheme, and all statutory compliances were met by the company.
4. The Regional Director of Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax provided favorable responses regarding the scheme. The Competition Commission of India also approved the proposed combination. Additionally, necessary paper publications were made, and no objections were received from any statutory authorities.
5. The Tribunal examined the terms and conditions of the Composite Scheme of Arrangement to determine if it was in the interest of all stakeholders and the company itself. The Tribunal noted that the necessary notices were served to relevant statutory authorities as required by law.
6. Considering all the facts and circumstances, the Tribunal allowed the Company Petition CP.No.19/230/HDB/2017. The Composite Scheme of Arrangement was sanctioned, declared binding on all stakeholders, and directed the company to file a certified copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. The company was also directed to communicate the sanction of the scheme to all concerned parties appropriately.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
