Tribunal overturns tax assessment, no addition under Section 69C required. Remanded for fresh consideration.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that no addition under Section 69C of the IT Act was warranted. The matter was remanded back to the AO for fresh consideration after considering the detailed reply filed by the assessee and the decision in the case of the assessee's daughter. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
Appeal against addition of unexplained credits u/s.69C of the IT Act.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-32, Mumbai for A.Y.2005-06 regarding the addition of unexplained credits u/s.69C of the IT Act. The AO received information that the assessee was a beneficiary of Mahasagar Securities Ltd. group involved in fraudulent activities. The AO observed that the assessee had laundered money through bogus transactions of shares. Notice u/s.148 was issued, but the assessee did not appear during reassessment proceedings. The AO made additions u/s.69C, which was upheld by the CIT(A).

The assessee contended that a similar addition in the case of the daughter of the assessee was deleted by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the daughter had offered income in the subsequent year, leading to the deletion of the addition. However, in the present case, it was unclear if the assessee had offered income in the subsequent year. As the assessee did not appear before the AO, the matter was restored back to the AO for fresh consideration.

During the remand proceedings, the AO confirmed the fraudulent billing activity between the assessee and M/s. Alliance Intermediateries & Network Pvt. Ltd. The AO made additions based on speculative transactions, but it was found that no actual payment was made for the shares purchased. The Tribunal noted that the profit from speculative transactions was offered in the same year and utilized for share purchases, which were later sold in the next year.

The Tribunal concluded that as no payment was made for the share purchases and the profit from speculative transactions was disclosed and assessed in the subsequent year, there was no justification for the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that no addition under Section 69C was warranted.

In the interest of justice, the matter was remanded back to the AO for fresh consideration after taking into account the detailed reply filed by the assessee and the decision in the case of the assessee's daughter. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.

---