<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 724 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that no addition under Section 69C of the IT Act was warranted. The matter was remanded back to the AO for fresh consideration after considering the detailed reply filed by the assessee and the decision in the case of the assessee&#039;s daughter. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 724 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that no addition under Section 69C of the IT Act was warranted. The matter was remanded back to the AO for fresh consideration after considering the detailed reply filed by the assessee and the decision in the case of the assessee&#039;s daughter. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>