Waiver of pre-deposit in excise appeals justified where financial hardship and a strong valuation issue supported hearing the case on merits.

Waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was justified where the assessee showed undue hardship through continued financial losses and raised a valuation dispute with substantial prima facie support. The Court noted that the demand stemmed from duty and penalty orders under Sections 11A and 11AC, and that the question whether the value of batteries supplied with UPS systems was includible in assessable value warranted consideration on merits. In these circumstances, insisting on a full or substantive deposit before hearing the appeals was unnecessary, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for decision without pre-deposit.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the ground of undue hardship and a prima facie case.

Analysis: The demand arose from duty and penalty orders under Sections 11A and 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the appeals before the Tribunal were accompanied by a request to dispense with pre-deposit. The assessee relied on continued financial losses and on the contention that the value of batteries supplied with UPS systems was not includible in the assessable value. The Court treated the financial condition as relevant to undue hardship and also noticed that the valuation issue had substantial prima facie support, making it undesirable to insist on a full or substantive deposit before the appeals were heard.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to decide the appeals on merits without requiring any pre-deposit.

---