<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34257</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras set aside the orders of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal and a learned single Judge, remitting the cases back to the Tribunal without requiring the appellant to deposit any pre-deposit amount. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s financial condition, losses incurred, and undue hardship faced, ultimately concluding that it would be inappropriate to demand payment given the circumstances. The Writ Appeals were allowed with observations, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34257</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras set aside the orders of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal and a learned single Judge, remitting the cases back to the Tribunal without requiring the appellant to deposit any pre-deposit amount. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s financial condition, losses incurred, and undue hardship faced, ultimately concluding that it would be inappropriate to demand payment given the circumstances. The Writ Appeals were allowed with observations, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>