Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003 despite clearing some goods under its own brand name and other goods under the brand name of third parties with payment of duty and availing Cenvat credit on inputs used for the branded goods.
Analysis: The exemption notification had to be read according to its own terms and the scheme of the notification. Clearances bearing the brand name or trade name of third parties were treated separately from the assessee's own exempt clearances, and such branded clearances did not disqualify the assessee from claiming exemption on its own products when no Cenvat credit was taken for those exempt clearances. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that branded goods of third parties do not defeat SSI exemption for the assessee's own goods where the notification conditions are otherwise satisfied.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE dated 01.03.2003, and the demand, interest, and penalty could not be sustained.