Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an SSI unit that avails CENVAT or MODVAT credit only in respect of branded goods manufactured on job work for third parties, after paying excise duty on those goods, is thereby disentitled from claiming SSI exemption for its own clearances under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The relevant exemption notifications treated clearances bearing another person's brand name as outside the computation of aggregate value of clearances for home consumption and also excluded such goods from the exemption itself. The notifications therefore drew a clear distinction between the assessee's own exempt clearances and branded goods manufactured for third parties on job work, which were to bear normal duty liability. Once duty was paid on those branded goods, credit on inputs used for such manufacture could be availed without affecting the assessee's entitlement to SSI exemption for its own products. The earlier decision concerning Notification No. 175/86-CE was confined to simultaneous enjoyment of exemption and Modvat on the same scheme and did not govern the later notifications, which contained specific exclusion clauses.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to claim SSI exemption on its own goods notwithstanding availment of CENVAT or MODVAT credit for duty-paid branded goods manufactured on job work for third parties.