Rule 16 credit on returned goods covers repair, reconditioning and salvaging, with no partial reversal absent legal authority.

Duty-paid goods received back for repair or reconditioning under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 are treated as inputs by legal fiction, and the assessee is entitled to take and retain CENVAT credit on their receipt. The Tribunal applied settled precedent that repair, dismantling, reconditioning and salvaging of usable parts form part of manufacture in this context, and that the credit cannot be split between usable and unusable portions without legal authority. The demand for reversal of the credit was therefore unsustainable, and full credit was allowed to be retained.

---

---

Issues: Whether goods received back for reconditioning or repair attracted reversal of the entire CENVAT credit, or whether credit was available in full under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Analysis: The goods had been cleared on payment of duty and were later received back because of defects. The brought-back goods were subjected to repair, reconditioning, dismantling and, where repair was not possible, salvaging of usable parts for use in other manufactured equipment. The Tribunal applied the settled interpretation of Rule 16, under which duty-paid goods received back for re-making, refining, reconditioning or similar purposes are treated as inputs by legal fiction. It followed binding precedent holding that such processing, including dismantling and salvaging, forms part of manufacture and that the credit cannot be apportioned between usable and unusable portions in the absence of legal authority.

Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to retain the full credit taken on receipt of the goods back, and the demand for reversal of the credit was unsustainable.

---