Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for failure to afford personal hearing and adequate opportunity before completion of assessment.
Analysis: The pre-assessment notice was served on the assessee only on 12.09.2016, while the assessment order was passed on 30.09.2016, leaving no real opportunity to file objections within the stipulated period. The assessee's explanation for not responding within time was supported by affidavit and remained unrebutted. More importantly, the proviso to Section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 required personal hearing, and the departmental circular could not dilute the statutory mandate. A circular requiring reasonable opportunity had to operate consistently with the statute, and the statutory requirement of personal hearing had to be honoured.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside for breach of the requirement of personal hearing and fair opportunity, and the matter was remitted for fresh assessment after granting personal hearing and considering the assessee's objections.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute mandates personal hearing, an administrative circular cannot curtail that right, and an assessment completed without affording such hearing is vitiated for violation of statutory procedure and natural justice.