Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether consideration paid for software licence amounted to royalty chargeable to tax in India and whether the payer was liable to deduct tax at source and be treated as an assessee in default.
Analysis: The software agreement granted only a limited right to use the computer programme for internal business purposes. The recipient retained all ownership and intellectual property rights, and the payer did not obtain any of the exclusive rights comprised in copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957. Computer software may fall within literary work, but the treaty definition of royalty requires consideration for the use of, or right to use, copyright itself and not merely the use of copyrighted material. The broader domestic-law amendment inserting Explanation 4 to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could not enlarge the treaty meaning, since the assessee was entitled to rely on the more beneficial treaty provisions. In the absence of a permanent establishment of the non-resident recipient in India, the payment was not taxable as business income under the treaty.
Conclusion: The payment was not royalty under the India-Singapore DTAA, no tax was deductible at source under section 195, and the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: For treaty purposes, consideration for a software licence is not royalty unless it is paid for the use of, or right to use, copyright in the software; a mere right to use the software as a copyrighted article is not sufficient, and a later domestic amendment cannot expand the unamended treaty meaning.