TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Time-barred demand, no deliberate suppression of facts.</h1> <h3>Commissioner, Central Excise, Lucknow Versus M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd.</h3> Commissioner, Central Excise, Lucknow Versus M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd. - TMI The High Court of Allahabad dismissed an appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the demand raised by the Revenue was found to be barred by limitation. The Tribunal ruled that there was no deliberate suppression of facts, but a bona fide dispute, and directed the Revenue authorities to requantify the demand falling within the period of limitation. The appellant accepted a previous judgment on the matter, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
TaxTMI 