Appeal partially allowed, deletion of uncorroborated addition, restoration of Assessing Officer's addition with 8% profit rate.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 3.43 crores based on uncorroborated survey statements and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal restored the Assessing Officer's original addition by applying an 8% profit rate on the total turnover.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Endorsement of inquiry and forceful disclosure.
2. Addition based on uncorroborated survey statements.
3. Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Endorsement of Inquiry and Forceful Disclosure:
The appellant contested that the CIT(A) erred in endorsing the inquiry conducted by the survey team and the Assessing Officer (AO), which involved obtaining a forceful disclosure from the appellant and subsequently disregarding the retraction letter. The appellant argued that the CIT(A) did not follow the CBDT instruction F. No. 286/2/2003-IT dated 10/03/2003, which pertains to the treatment of statements obtained during surveys.

2. Addition Based on Uncorroborated Survey Statements:
The appellant challenged the CIT(A)'s confirmation of additions made solely on the basis of statements recorded during the survey, which were not backed by any corroborative evidence. During the survey, two tentative trading accounts were prepared, showing significant discrepancies in gross profit figures. The appellant initially declared additional unaccounted income but later retracted this declaration, citing incomplete books of account and unaccounted creditor bills.

The AO rejected the appellant's books of account under section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and computed the total income at 8% of the total turnover, resulting in an addition of Rs. 15,79,813/-. The AO also added Rs. 3,43,24,120/- based on the retracted declaration during the survey.

The CIT(A) upheld this addition, stating that the appellant failed to explain the significant variance in gross profits between the two trading accounts. The CIT(A) concluded that the appellant inflated expenses to reduce taxable profits, and the retraction was unsupported by corroborative evidence.

3. Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia):
The AO disallowed interest payments to Sunderam Finance and Manga Finance amounting to Rs. 23,92,290/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the appellant's failure to deduct tax at source. The CIT(A) affirmed this disallowance, referencing the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court's decision in CIT, Kolkata -XI vs. Crescent Export Syndicate, which held that section 40(a)(ia) applies to expenses payable at any time during the relevant previous year.

Tribunal's Findings:
1. Endorsement of Inquiry and Forceful Disclosure: The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue but focused on the substantive additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A).

2. Addition Based on Uncorroborated Survey Statements: The Tribunal found that the addition of Rs. 3.43 crores based on a tentative profit and loss account prepared during the survey was not sustainable without corroborative evidence of suppressed sales or bogus expenditure. The Tribunal cited the Hon'ble Apex Court's decision in CIT vs. S. Khader Khan, which held that statements obtained during surveys, without supporting evidence, cannot be the sole basis for additions. The Tribunal restored the AO's original addition by applying an 8% profit rate on the total turnover, deleting the Rs. 3.43 crores addition.

3. Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia): The Tribunal noted that the sums involved were paid by the end of the year, with no amounts outstanding. It referenced the Tribunal's decision in M/s Chadda Transport, which followed the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court's ruling in CIT vs. Vector Shipping Services P. Ltd. The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to amounts paid by the end of the year, and deleted the disallowance of Rs. 23,92,290/-.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 3.43 crores based on the tentative trading account and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), while restoring the AO's original addition by applying an 8% profit rate on the total turnover.

---