Treaty teaching-service exclusion is limited where composite foreign payments include taxable elements and cannot be fully segregated.

Composite payments to a U.S. educational entity were examined under Article 12 of the India-USA treaty to determine whether fees for seminars, workshops, telemedicine, e-learning, faculty exchanges and related intellectual property elements were taxable as included services or excluded as teaching in or by educational institutions. Services substantially connected with educational programmes could fall within the teaching exclusion, but the payments were bundled and not separately attributable to excluded teaching services alone. As a result, the payer could not claim that no tax was deductible at source on the entire amount and had to seek determination of the chargeable portion before deducting tax.

---

---

Issues: Whether tax was required to be deducted at source under section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on payments made to the U.S. entity towards annual fees and additional fees, having regard to Article 12 of the India-USA tax treaty and the exclusion for teaching in or by educational institutions.

Analysis: The arrangement was examined as a composite agreement for educational and teaching services, including workshops, seminars, telemedicine, e-learning, faculty-student exchanges, and use of intellectual property. Fees for included services under Article 12(4) were contrasted with the exclusion in Article 12(5)(c) for teaching in or by educational institutions. The services involving seminars, workshops, teleconferencing, e-learning, and tuition-linked educational activity were treated as capable of falling within the exclusion where they were substantially connected with the applicant's educational programmes. At the same time, the record showed lump sum payments for multiple services, including possible intellectual property elements, and it was not possible to segregate the amount attributable solely to excluded teaching services. Therefore, the entire payment could not be treated as outside taxability.

Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to a ruling that no tax at source was deductible at all. The applicant was required to seek determination under section 195(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and deduct tax only on the portion of the payment found chargeable to tax.

Final Conclusion: The ruling held that the payment stream was only partly covered by the treaty exclusion for educational teaching services, and tax deduction at source could not be denied altogether.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a composite payment to a non-resident includes both potentially taxable services and services falling within the treaty exclusion for teaching in or by educational institutions, tax deduction under section 195 applies at least to the chargeable portion and the payer must seek determination of that portion under section 195(2).

---