Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, having not raised a legal ground in the earlier proceedings, could be permitted to invoke rectification and place the contention before the appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The dispute concerned assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the order of the appellate authority. The legal contention related to the treatment of tax collected and the claim of input tax credit, which was held to be capable of being considered as a legal ground. The statutory scheme under Section 84 permits the Assessing Authority and the Appellate Authority to rectify an error apparent on the face of the record within the prescribed period. Though the ground had not been specifically raised earlier, the Court held that the assessee should be given one opportunity to place the contention before the appellate authority by an application under Section 84.
Conclusion: The assessee was permitted to file an application under Section 84 before the appellate authority within the time granted, and the authority was directed to consider it on merits and in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A pure legal contention relating to tax assessment may be permitted to be raised through rectification proceedings where the statute authorises correction of apparent errors.