Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... GA ORDER Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is a dealer and an assessee on the file of the first respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The order impugned in this writ petition is an order passed by the second resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Appellate Authority, then the petitioner should have filed an appeal before the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, for which, the limitation period prescribed is 60 days with another 60 days along with an application for condonation of delay. However, the petitioner was not diligent enough and the time has expired and the petitioner can....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ibunal, at any time, within five years from the date of any order passed by it, to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record. It may be true that the petitioner has not raised this ground specifically in the grounds of appeal before the second respondent. Nevertheless, this being a legal contention, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted one opportunity to raise th....