Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the eligibility of service tax credit on outward transportation could be decided without first determining the place of removal.
Analysis: The orders of the lower authorities had not examined the foundational question whether the transportation was up to the place of removal or beyond it. The Board circular required the place of removal to be determined before deciding admissibility of credit on outward transportation, and the record showed that this exercise had not been undertaken. In the absence of findings on these basic aspects, the matter could not be finally decided on merits.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority to determine the place of removal and then decide eligibility of credit after giving the appellants an opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was not finally adjudicated on merits and was sent back for fresh decision in accordance with the circular and other applicable judicial proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility of credit on outward transportation must be determined only after deciding the place of removal.