TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the requirement of filing a Bill of Entry under the first proviso to section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 was satisfied so as to make the settlement application maintainable.
Analysis: The Settlement Commission had already accepted the petitioners on the other admissibility conditions and rejected the application only on the footing that the Bill of Entry had not been filed before the show cause notice. In the connected matter decided on the same day, the Court held that this condition stood complied with. Applying the same reasoning, the Court found that the impugned rejection could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The requirement under the first proviso to section 127B was held to be satisfied, and the petitioners succeeded.
TaxTMI 
