Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to exclusion of the value of goods and materials sold from the taxable value under Notification No. 12/2003-ST dated 20.06.2003, and whether the Revenue had established that the 80:20 bifurcation between goods and services was artificial.
Analysis: The assessee issued separate invoices showing the value of goods sold and the value of services rendered, paid VAT on the goods component, and the work order as well as the balance sheet reflected the same arrangement. The notification permits exclusion of the value of goods and materials sold where documentary proof specifies that value. The allegation that the bifurcation was artificial was not supported by any documentary evidence or investigation material. The authorities below had already examined the invoices, work order, and supporting accounts, and found the split to be reasonable.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the notification, and the Revenue failed to dislodge the factual finding supporting the bifurcation.