Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Works contract service tax demand set aside where genuine 80% material 20% service bifurcation established CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal against service tax demand on works contract service. The appellant had contracts clearly specifying 80% material ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Works contract service tax demand set aside where genuine 80% material 20% service bifurcation established
CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal against service tax demand on works contract service. The appellant had contracts clearly specifying 80% material value and 20% service value. The Commissioner (Appeals) incorrectly distinguished a previous Tribunal decision in appellant's favor, claiming artificial bifurcation. CESTAT found the bifurcation genuine as work orders stipulated 80% value for materials subject to VAT. The demand was set aside except for service tax on trade discount of Rs. 6,80,248/- which was confirmed as trading activity, not service.
Issues involved: The issues involved in the judgment are demand on trading of goods/pure sale, demand on composite works (works contract & repair works), and demand on trade discount.
Demand on Trading of Goods/Pure Sale: The appellant undertook activities for various entities by supplying goods like electric motors, pump sets, and water pipes. The Department alleged evasion of service tax by artificially breaking figures into an 80:20 ratio. The appellant argued that the service tax demand pertained to goods sold on which VAT was already discharged. The Tribunal held that no service tax could be levied on the amount received from trading goods where VAT was already paid.
Demand on Composite Works (Works Contract & Repair Works): The appellant received work orders specifying 80% of the contract value as material and 20% as service. The Department alleged artificial bifurcation of values, leading to the evasion of service tax. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of examining the actual quantity of materials supplied. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision, stating that the bifurcation was not artificial and upheld the appellant's claim.
Demand on Trade Discount: The demand on trade discount was confirmed by the Commissioner as no submissions were made by the appellant on this issue. The Tribunal confirmed the Commissioner's decision on this issue.
In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order regarding demand on trading of goods/pure sale and demand on composite works, citing previous decisions in favor of the appellant. The demand on trade discount was confirmed. The appeal was allowed in part, with the order dated 06.06.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) being set aside except for the service tax demand on trade discount, which was confirmed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
of 
TaxTMI 
