Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the limitation prescribed under section 11B of the Central Excise Act applies to a refund claim arising under the compounded levy scheme governed by the Pan Masala Packing Machine (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008.
Analysis: The refund claim arose from abatement of duty under the compounded levy scheme. The operative question was whether the general refund limitation under section 11B could be imported into that special scheme. Relying on the principle that the compounded levy scheme is a self-contained and comprehensive code, and that general provisions of the Central Excise Act and Rules stand excluded where inconsistent with such special scheme, the limitation under section 11B was held inapplicable. The reasoning was supported by earlier decisions holding that the special scheme governs refund and excess payment issues without importing the normal excise limitation regime.
Conclusion: Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to the refund claim arising under the compounded levy scheme; the refund could not be rejected as time-barred. The appeal was therefore allowed and the refund relief was granted to the assessee.