Compound levy scheme under Central Excise law is self-contained; Section 11A does not govern recovery demands

The compound levy scheme under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for hot re-rolling mills, read with the Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, operates as a self-contained levy mechanism with its own rules on assessment, payment, interest and penalty. General recovery provisions were not intended to be imported where the special scheme governs the field. Section 11A is not an omnibus limitation provision for every recovery under the Act and does not apply to demands raised under this special compound levy scheme. The demand notices issued under that mechanism were therefore unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the limitation and recovery procedure under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to demands raised under the compound levy scheme for hot re-rolling mills governed by the annual capacity determination rules.

Analysis: The compound levy scheme under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Hot-Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 was held to be a self-contained and separate scheme from the normal scheme of excise collection. The scheme prescribed its own method of assessment, payment, interest, and penalty, and therefore general provisions of the Act were not intended to be imported where the special scheme governed the field. The Court followed the settled view that Section 11A is not an omnibus limitation provision for every recovery under the Act and does not apply where a distinct levy mechanism operates under a special scheme.

Conclusion: Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to recovery under the compound levy scheme. The demand notices challenged by the appellants were therefore unsustainable.

---