1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Upholds Commissioner's Decision on Excess Deposits under Compounded Levy Scheme</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding excess deposits made by the respondents under Compounded ... Refund - Limitation - Compounded Levy Scheme, excess payment thereunder The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding excess deposits made by the respondents under Compounded Levy Scheme. The Tribunal ruled that refunds of such deposits are governed by Rule 96ZB without any time limit, following the precedent set in the case of M/s. Mohinder Steels. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected.