Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger and Transfer of Undertakings

The court granted sanction for the Scheme of Arrangement involving Demerger and Transfer of Undertakings under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The scheme aimed to segregate activities between two companies, focusing on Investment and Maintenance Undertakings, with the Manufacturing Undertaking transferred to another company. The court found the scheme to be in the interest of shareholders, creditors, and the public, granting the sanction as prayed in the petitions. Costs were awarded to the Central Govt. Standing Counsel, and directions were given for further administrative steps.

---

---

Issues:
Petitions for sanction of a Scheme of Arrangement involving Demerger and Transfer of Undertakings under Companies Act, 1956.

Analysis:
1. Nature of Scheme and Undertakings:
- Two companies filed petitions for sanction of a Scheme of Arrangement involving Demerger and Transfer of Undertakings under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
- Amazon Textiles Private Limited engaged in textile processing, leasing machinery, maintenance contracts, and investments. The proposed scheme aims to segregate activities, focusing on Investment and Maintenance Undertakings, transferring Manufacturing Undertaking to Abeer Textile Private Limited.

2. Creditor Approval and Meetings:
- Equity Shareholders and Unsecured Creditors meetings were held for both Demerged and Resulting Companies, with approvals obtained.
- Secured Creditors meeting for the Resulting Company was adjourned but eventually approved the Scheme.

3. Publication and Objections:
- Petitions were admitted, and notices for hearings were advertised in newspapers and gazette. No objections were raised post-publication.

4. Central Government and Regional Director Observations:
- Observations by the Regional Director were addressed through affidavits and submissions.
- Issues included non-compliance with Companies Act, 2013, disclosure of assets and liabilities, sufficiency of Authorized Capital, adjournment of meetings, contingent liabilities, and Income Tax Department communication.

5. Court Decision and Sanction:
- After considering all contentions, the court found the scheme in the interest of shareholders, creditors, and the public. Sanction was granted as prayed in the petitions.
- Costs to the Central Govt. Standing Counsel were quantified, and directions were given for stamp duty adjudication, filing with concerned authorities, and issuance of authenticated orders.

6. Final Directives:
- Lodging of orders and scheme, filing with Registrar of Companies, and dispensation of drawn-up orders were directed.
- Concerned authorities were instructed to act on the order promptly, with the Registrar to issue authenticated copies swiftly.

---