Tribunal ruling excludes hardware sales from export turnover for deductions under Sections 10A and 10B.

The Tribunal held that hardware sales cannot be included in export turnover for deduction under Section 10A, as they were invoiced separately from software sales. The Tribunal directed exclusion of certain expenses from export turnover for deduction under Section 10B, emphasizing consistency in excluding these expenses from total turnover. The Tribunal affirmed that expenses excluded from export turnover must also be excluded from total turnover for computing deductions under Sections 10A and 10B. The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, upholding the exclusion of hardware sales and directing consistent treatment of excluded expenses in export and total turnover calculations.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Exclusion of hardware sales from export turnover for deduction under Section 10A.
2. Exclusion of telecommunication expenses, insurance charges, personnel expenses, professional expenses, branch office expenses, and other expenses incurred in foreign exchange from export turnover for deduction under Section 10B.
3. Exclusion of said expenses from total turnover if excluded from export turnover for deduction under Section 10B/10A.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Exclusion of Hardware Sales from Export Turnover for Deduction Under Section 10A:

The assessee argued that hardware sales should be included in the export turnover as they are inextricably linked to the software sales. The hardware, such as servers, is essential for the software to function. The assessee provided examples of how the hardware and software were sold together as part of a composite contract. However, the Tribunal found that the hardware and software were ordered and invoiced separately. The hardware was purchased from the market and not manufactured by the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the sale of hardware cannot be considered part of the export turnover for deduction under Section 10A, as the hardware and software were treated differently in the orders and invoices. The Tribunal relied on the judgment in the case of Wipro Ltd. v. DCIT, where it was held that monitors sold separately are not part of the computer, but those sold with computers are part of the computer.

2. Exclusion of Telecommunication Expenses, Insurance Charges, Personnel Expenses, Professional Expenses, Branch Office Expenses, and Other Expenses Incurred in Foreign Exchange from Export Turnover for Deduction Under Section 10B:

The Tribunal was directed by the High Court to adjudicate whether these expenses should be excluded from the export turnover for the purpose of computing deduction under Section 10B. The Tribunal noted that these expenses, if excluded from the export turnover, should also be excluded from the total turnover. This is in line with the decision in the case of Tata Elxsi Ltd., where it was held that whatever is excluded from the export turnover must also be excluded from the total turnover to ensure consistency in computation.

3. Exclusion of Said Expenses from Total Turnover if Excluded from Export Turnover for Deduction Under Section 10B/10A:

The Tribunal affirmed that if specific expenses are excluded from the export turnover, they must also be excluded from the total turnover. This principle was upheld in the case of Tata Elxsi Ltd. and supported by the Special Bench decision in ITO v. Sak Soft Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized that total turnover includes export turnover, and any exclusion from the latter should reflect in the former to maintain consistency in the computation of deductions under Sections 10A and 10B.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the sale of hardware cannot be included in the export turnover for deduction under Section 10A. It upheld the CIT(Appeals) order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for recomputation of the deduction. The Tribunal also confirmed that expenses excluded from the export turnover should be excluded from the total turnover, ensuring consistency in the computation of deductions under Sections 10A and 10B. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.

---