Court directs respondent to consider communication, issue orders within 6 weeks. Writ Petition disposed, no costs. The court directed the fourth respondent to consider the communication from the second respondent and issue appropriate orders within six weeks. The Writ ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court directs respondent to consider communication, issue orders within 6 weeks. Writ Petition disposed, no costs.
The court directed the fourth respondent to consider the communication from the second respondent and issue appropriate orders within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs incurred.
Issues: Petitioner seeks mandamus for corrections in RITC numbers on shipping bills and clarification to fourth respondent.
Analysis: The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking a mandamus to direct the first and second respondents to correct the RITC numbers on shipping bills and provide necessary clarifications to the fourth respondent within a specified time frame. The court noted that it was unnecessary to delve into the merits of the petitioner's contentions due to subsequent developments during the case. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Exports)/second respondent, through a letter dated 24.06.2016, indicated no objection to amending the shipping bills as detailed in the communication to the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade/fourth respondent. Consequently, the court directed the fourth respondent to consider the communication from the second respondent and issue appropriate orders within six weeks from receiving a copy of the court's order. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs incurred.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.