<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 118 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333098</link>
    <description>The court directed the fourth respondent to consider the communication from the second respondent and issue appropriate orders within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 13:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 118 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333098</link>
      <description>The court directed the fourth respondent to consider the communication from the second respondent and issue appropriate orders within six weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>