Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under Notification No. 253/82-CE dated 8.11.2002 was available to cotton grey fabrics claimed to have been subjected to scouring, or whether the process undertaken amounted to bleaching so as to deny the exemption.
Analysis: The findings of the lower authorities that the fabrics were bleached rested mainly on the use of boiler and kettle, without supporting technical material. The process described by the appellant was scouring, namely treatment in an alkaline medium to remove natural oil and dirt, which is distinct from bleaching. The sample analysis described the goods as off-white woven fabrics, which did not support a clear finding that bleaching had taken place. The notification expressly exempted scoured fabrics without conditions, and no other reliable evidence established that the process was anything other than scouring.
Conclusion: The exemption was held to be admissible, and the denial of benefit was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the evidence does not reliably establish bleaching and the notified exemption expressly covers scouring, the exemption cannot be denied merely on suspicion or on an unsupported inference from the machinery used.