Tribunal Upholds Duty Demand on EOU for Imported Goods

The Tribunal upheld the demand on the 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for imported goods cleared under exemption Notification No. 13/81-Cus. The appellant was directed to pay a penalty equal to the duty confirmed under Section 114A of the Customs Act, in accordance with Supreme Court decisions. Additionally, the appellant was ordered to pay interest under Section 28AB on the duty amount. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was modified to include the interest payment, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and judicial precedents.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against Order-in-Original regarding demand on 100% EOU for imported goods under exemption Notification No. 13/81-Cus, penalty imposition under Section 114A of Customs Act, interest demand under Section 28AB.

Analysis:
1. Demand on 100% EOU: The appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the Order-in-Original confirming the demand on 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for the period August 1993 to July 1997 concerning imported raw material and capital goods. The goods were cleared under exemption Notification No. 13/81-Cus, but as they were not put to use and export obligations were not fulfilled, duty was confirmed. However, the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority was &8377; 25,00,000/-, which was less than the duty amount of &8377; 68,22,953/-. The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 114A should be equal to the duty confirmed, citing relevant Supreme Court decisions. The appellant was directed to pay the penalty equal to the duty amount.

2. Penalty Imposition under Section 114A: Section 114A of the Customs Act mandates that the penalty for short-levy or non-levy of duty should be equal to the duty determined. In this case, the duty confirmed was &8377; 68,22,953/-, but the adjudicating authority imposed a penalty of &8377; 25,00,000/-, contrary to the statutory provision. The Tribunal, relying on Supreme Court judgments, emphasized that the penalty cannot be reduced from the duty amount. Therefore, the appellant was held liable to pay the penalty equal to the duty confirmed, as per Section 114A of the Act.

3. Interest Demand under Section 28AB: Despite the adjudicating authority acknowledging in Para 15 of the order that interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act was payable on the duty amount, the interest demand was not confirmed in the operative part of the order. The Tribunal noted this apparent error and directed the appellant to pay interest under Section 28AB on the confirmed duty amount of &8377; 68,22,953/-. The order was modified to include the interest payment, in line with the legal provisions. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was modified accordingly.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the demand on the 100% EOU for imported goods, directed the appellant to pay the penalty equal to the duty confirmed under Section 114A, and ordered the payment of interest under Section 28AB on the duty amount. The decision was based on statutory provisions and relevant judicial precedents, ensuring compliance with the legal framework governing customs duties and penalties.

---