Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 require notice or hearing to the borrower or guarantor, and whether the District Magistrate acts in a non-adjudicatory capacity while facilitating possession of the secured asset.
Analysis: Section 14 authorises the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate to assist the secured creditor in taking possession of the secured asset when request is made in writing. The provision operates as part of the SARFAESI recovery scheme and does not contemplate an opportunity of hearing at the stage of consideration of such request. The function performed by the District Magistrate is administrative and ministerial, not adjudicatory. The remedy of the borrower lies after possession is taken, and the requirement of natural justice is not imported into Section 14 at this stage.
Conclusion: The order insisting on impleadment of the legal heirs before proceeding under Section 14 was held to be not legally sustainable and was set aside.