Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (7) TMI 670 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Eligibility of Cargo Company for Tax Deduction in Housing Project Development The Tribunal considered the eligibility of a private limited company, primarily engaged in the cargo business, for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Eligibility of Cargo Company for Tax Deduction in Housing Project Development

                            The Tribunal considered the eligibility of a private limited company, primarily engaged in the cargo business, for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a joint development agreement for a housing project. The Tribunal allowed deduction only on income from the development activity, excluding capital gains, and directed proportionate deduction for flats exceeding the prescribed area. The revenue's appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Nature of the assessee’s business and its impact on the eligibility for deduction.
                            3. Compliance with the Memorandum of Articles and Articles of Association.
                            4. Treatment of income from the sale of flats and classification as capital gains.
                            5. Proportionate deduction for flats exceeding the prescribed area.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80IB(10):
                            The primary issue revolves around whether the assessee, engaged in the cargo business, qualifies for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a private limited company, entered into a joint development agreement with Mangalya Developers for developing a housing project on its land. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] allowed the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80IB(10), which was contested by the revenue.

                            2. Nature of Assessee’s Business:
                            The revenue argued that since the assessee is primarily in the cargo business and not in the business of developing and building housing projects, it should not be eligible for the deduction. The revenue emphasized that the assessee merely provided the land and did not participate in the construction activities, thus failing to meet the requirements for deduction under Section 80IB(10).

                            3. Compliance with Memorandum of Articles and Articles of Association:
                            The revenue contended that the assessee’s Memorandum of Articles and Articles of Association did not authorize it to engage in the business of developing and building housing projects. The CIT(A) held that there was no specific condition in Section 80IB(10) requiring the main object of the company to be construction of housing, and thus, the assessee’s ancillary construction activities were permissible.

                            4. Treatment of Income from Sale of Flats:
                            The revenue argued that the income from the sale of flats should be classified as ‘income from capital gains’ rather than business income, given that the land was listed as a fixed asset in the assessee’s depreciation schedule. The CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to compute the deduction by excluding the capital gains component and considering only the business income from the sale of flats.

                            5. Proportionate Deduction for Flats Exceeding Prescribed Area:
                            The revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s direction to allow proportionate deduction for flats exceeding the prescribed area of 1500 sq. ft., relying on the decision in the case of SJR Builders. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s direction, instructing the AO to compute the correct area and allow proportionate deduction accordingly.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and relevant material on record. It noted that the assessee contributed the land while the developer bore the entire cost of construction. The Tribunal acknowledged that the income derived from the sale of flats developed under the housing project is eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10), but only on the income arising from the development activity. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the income, excluding the capital gains component, and allow proportionate deduction for flats exceeding the prescribed area. The appeals of the revenue were partly allowed for statistical purposes.

                            Order Pronouncement:
                            The order was pronounced in the open court on 8th June 2016, with the appeals of the revenue being partly allowed for statistical purposes.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found