Statutory deduction limits under house property and other sources income bar unsupported expense claims without clear nexus.

Deductions against income from house property are confined to those expressly permitted by statute, so brokerage, legal expenses and insurance expenses were not allowable; maintenance charges could be considered only if paid to the housing society and properly verifiable. Interest on fixed deposits was treated as income from other sources, and expenditure claimed against that income was not deductible because it was not shown to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant receipts. The note emphasises that statutory nexus is required for deductions under both heads, and unsupported claims are disallowed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether brokerage, legal expenses, maintenance charges and insurance expenses were deductible while computing income from house property; (ii) whether expenditure of Rs. 21,06,469 claimed against interest from fixed deposits and other receipts was allowable as deduction.

Issue (i): Whether brokerage, legal expenses, maintenance charges and insurance expenses were deductible while computing income from house property.

Analysis: Only those deductions specifically provided under the provisions governing income from house property are allowable. Brokerage, legal expenses and insurance expenses do not fall within the permitted deductions. Maintenance charges could be allowed only if they were paid to the housing society and were verifiable as such.

Conclusion: The disallowance of brokerage, legal expenses and insurance expenses was upheld, and the matter relating to maintenance charges was left to verification as directed by the lower authority.

Issue (ii): Whether expenditure of Rs. 21,06,469 claimed against interest from fixed deposits and other receipts was allowable as deduction.

Analysis: Interest earned on fixed deposits was treated as income from other sources and not business income. The expenditure claimed was not shown to have been incurred wholly and exclusively for earning that income, and therefore no deduction under the relevant provisions for income from other sources was available.

Conclusion: The disallowance of Rs. 21,06,469 was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's appeal failed in substance, and the additions and disallowances sustained by the lower authorities remained undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Deductions against income from house property and income from other sources are confined to the allowances expressly provided by the statute, and expenditure not shown to have the requisite statutory nexus with the relevant income is not deductible.

---