Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reversal of the entire credit availed on common inputs was sufficient in place of proportionate reversal so as to set aside the demand of 8% on exempted clearances, and whether interest and penalty were still leviable.
Analysis: Section 70 of the Finance Act, 2010 provided an option to an assessee to reverse proportionate credit availed on inputs used for dutiable and exempted final products, in which event the reversal would be treated as sufficient. The appellant had already reversed the full credit availed on the inputs instead of proportionate credit. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the reversal made was sufficient to meet the statutory requirement and the demand of 8% on exempted clearances could not survive. At the same time, interest for the intervening period remained payable at the applicable rate, and the statutory consequence of penalty did not arise.
Conclusion: The demand of 8% on exempted clearances was set aside, the reversal of credit was treated as sufficient, interest for the intervening period was held payable, and penalty was held not imposable.