<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1089 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329380</link>
    <description>Reversal of the entire credit availed on common inputs was treated as sufficient compliance with the statutory option for proportionate reversal where inputs were used for both dutiable and exempted final products, so the 8% demand on exempted clearances could not survive. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s full credit reversal met the requirement, but interest for the intervening period remained payable at the applicable rate. Penalty was not imposable, as the statutory consequence did not arise on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1089 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329380</link>
      <description>Reversal of the entire credit availed on common inputs was treated as sufficient compliance with the statutory option for proportionate reversal where inputs were used for both dutiable and exempted final products, so the 8% demand on exempted clearances could not survive. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s full credit reversal met the requirement, but interest for the intervening period remained payable at the applicable rate. Penalty was not imposable, as the statutory consequence did not arise on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>